A smartphone screen glowing in a dark room
Photo: Abdullah Öğük · Pexels
Hate & Extremism

The Massacre That Streamed for Seventeen Minutes

New Zealand's Royal Commission concluded that the gunman who murdered 51 worshippers at two Christchurch mosques in 2019 was radicalised largely online, citing YouTube as a significant influence. He broadcast the attack live on Facebook for about 17 minutes.

On 15 March 2019, a gunman opened fire during Friday prayers at the Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand. He killed 51 people and wounded dozens more in what remains the deadliest terrorist attack in the country's history, according to public records of the case. The attacker broadcast part of the assault on Facebook Live in a stream that ran for about 17 minutes.

The livestream did not stay confined to the moment it was filmed. Facebook later said it removed about 1.5 million copies of the video worldwide in the first 24 hours, blocking more than 1.2 million of them at the point of upload, according to the company's own account. The footage was classified as objectionable by New Zealand's chief censor.

AdvertisementStart Scan

What the inquiry found

New Zealand established a Royal Commission of Inquiry, the country's highest form of investigation, to examine the events leading up to the attack. Its report, released in December 2020, ran to 792 pages and made 44 recommendations, all of which the government said it accepted, according to reporting by CNBC.

The commission traced much of the perpetrator's descent into extremism to the internet. “We have no doubt that he visited right-wing internet forums, subscribed to right-wing channels on YouTube and read a great deal about immigration, far-right political theories, and historical struggles between Christianity and Islam,” the report stated, as quoted by Vice. The perpetrator himself told investigators that YouTube was, for him, a significant source of information and inspiration.

Attention turns to the platforms

The finding drew official attention to the mainstream services on which the attacker had spent his time, rather than only to fringe message boards. Then Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern singled out YouTube's role. “This is a point I plan to make directly to the leadership of YouTube,” she said, according to France 24.

Researchers who examined the case noted that the perpetrator had also participated in far-right groups on Facebook and had studied platform rules closely enough to avoid content that might trigger a suspension, according to Vice. The commission also found intelligence agencies had focused disproportionately on other threats, though it concluded there had been no plausible way to detect the plot except by chance, as reported by NPR.

A case that shaped the debate

Christchurch became a reference point in arguments over how recommendation systems and live video can channel users toward extremist material and spread violent content at speed. It prompted the Christchurch Call, an international initiative co-founded by New Zealand and France to curb terrorist and violent extremist content online, and it continues to feature in debates over platform accountability, according to the documented record of the response.